• If you are still using CentOS 7.9, it's time to convert to Alma 8 with the free centos2alma tool by Plesk or Plesk Migrator. Please let us know your experiences or concerns in this thread:
    CentOS2Alma discussion
  • Inviting everyone to the UX test of a new security feature in the WP Toolkit
    For WordPress site owners, threats posed by hackers are ever-present. Because of this, we are developing a new security feature for the WP Toolkit. If the topic of WordPress website security is relevant to you, we would be grateful if you could share your experience and help us test the usability of this feature. We invite you to join us for a 1-hour online session via Google Meet. Select a convenient meeting time with our friendly UX staff here.

Recent content by mcyg

  1. M

    Issue Spam protection - DNS blackohole list does not work for one of domains

    Yes, it is default plesk installation - quite fresh one installed on new fresh server less than month ago. OS: ‪Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS‬ Product: Plesk Obsidian 18.0.21 Update #5 , last updated at Dec 28, 2019 09:20 PM I changed one configuration outside Plesk which was hostname of emails that are...
  2. M

    Issue Spam protection - DNS blackohole list does not work for one of domains

    @Peter Debik Those emails are aready removed - but I will show another example: https://www.spamhaus.org/query/ip/45.82.32.142 Received: from bee.bpdaswss.com (bee.oliviertylczak.com [45.82.32.142]) by 1xxxxxxxxxx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 775473F059 for <xxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 17 Jan 2020...
  3. M

    Issue Spam protection - DNS blackohole list does not work for one of domains

    Full received header for another (also listed on blacklist) IP is: Received: from cap.onepwaa.com (cap.gratefulhope.com [208.187.167.8]) by ####MY IP###### (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C3C042B58 for <###MY EMAIL ADDRESS####>; Sat, 11 Jan 2020 13:52:17 +0100 (CET)
  4. M

    Issue Spam protection - DNS blackohole list does not work for one of domains

    Thank you. Those are logs which I can find for that IP from today Jan 11 09:49:30 168 postfix/smtpd[23375]: connect from tent.procars-shop-sk1.com[69.94.131.10] Jan 11 09:49:30 168 postfix/smtpd[23375]: B630842A46: client=tent.procars-shop-sk1.com[69.94.131.10] Jan 11 09:49:30 168...
  5. M

    Issue Spam protection - DNS blackohole list does not work for one of domains

    Yes, I do checked 'Switch ...' checkbox. If I uncheck this checkbox and remove value from the field , after clicking OK the old value seems to be there still - not sure if that is correct behaviour (as in attachement). But anyway I already was saving this field and whole form few times at least...
  6. M

    Issue Spam protection - DNS blackohole list does not work for one of domains

    OK, I don't know how this works internally - I just described how it looks from my point of view. Introducing this setting reduced number of spam emails in some of acconunts massivly but on others not at all. Question - if I have value for field 'DNS zones for DNSBL service' in Plesk...
  7. M

    Issue Spam protection - DNS blackohole list does not work for one of domains

    They are listed I am checking individual domains, IPs of senders on Blocklist Removal Center - The Spamhaus Project . So it looks to me like for one of the domains this setting from Plesk is not applied (as on the other domains I don't see such an emails anymore) - but my problem is I have no...
  8. M

    Issue Spam protection - DNS blackohole list does not work for one of domains

    Anyone has any idea how I can even start debugging / investigating it ? : )
  9. M

    Issue Spam protection - DNS blackohole list does not work for one of domains

    I had a lot of incoming spam on my mail addresses hosted by Plesk Obsidian. So I enabled ' Switch on spam protection based on DNS blackhole lists' in /plesk/server/mail/. It deffinitelly took effect for one of the domains and I get very low amount of spam now. However it does not tool any effect...
See more
Back
Top