Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The APS Catalog has been deprecated and removed from all Plesk Obsidian versions. Applications already installed from the APS Catalog will continue working. However, Plesk will no longer provide support for APS applications.
Please be aware: with the Plesk Obsidian 18.0.78 release, the support for the ngx_pagespeed.so module will be deprecated and removed from the sw-nginx package.
@La Linea
You can and you should.
Simply replace the certificates with new ones that do not contain OCSP rules AND remove all Nginx ssl_stapling related directives.
The
can be related to (insufficient) privileges, but if I am not mistaken, then the command should be limited to domains...
@Janko Falli
The statement
is not entirely correct, in a number of ways.
First of all, Plesk GUI should not "read" Nginx config and can hence not "reflect" that Nginx config.
If and when you get a green "UI indicator" by adding lines to the "Additional Nginx directives" .... and it...
@wolle
@Raul A. is right.
I think that you should first check your Fail2Ban and Firewall for the 18.203.120.118 and 52.30.104.252 IPs (and other IPs associated with Plesk updates).
If one of the IPs is blocked somehow, just unblock them : remove them from the Firewall and/or move to...
@snIP3r
The error message
is highly indicative of the fact that your old license was Web Host, whereas your new license is Web Admin.
One could go through all kinds of fuzz and manual steps, but I would recommend to
1 - request a trial Web Host license for migration,
2 - restore the...
Should the second
export PATH=/opt/plesk/php/8.3/bin:$PATH
not be export PATH=/opt/plesk/php/8.2/bin:$PATH ??
Stated differently, there seems to be a version typo once.
Kind regards....
PS Still not sure whether this whole setup with Litespeed is worth the effort. However, pretty sure...
@tertek,
It should never be supported, otherwise the attack surface would increase considerably by allowing (too much) access - code injection would be possible.
Nevertheless, I do understand your demand for "automation" of Nginx configuration.
At this moment, there are two methods to...
@Woutuit
To be honest, not that I am aware of.
That is, I am aware of some very very "dirty workarounds", but it is better to not elaborate upon that - for many reasons.
If you need a migration in general sense, then it is often recommended to wait until the bug fix has been applied to an...
@Woutuit,
It is not an issue about Debian support, as @Sebahat.hadzhi already correctly explained.
The Migration Manager had (and still has) some bugs that are not solved in a timely manner and this
"Failed to deploy Python on source server"
is one of them : the Migration Manager failed...
@greedysoul
The workaround suggested by @PeopleInside should work, but it still is not a solution - it is a mere workaround of an issue.
An alternative workaround is to set your system time one hour later or earlier : this barely has impact on your system, but it will resolve the PUM issue...
@Hangover2
I have to emphasize that I am not willing to go into the area of "agreement vs disagreement", that would not be appropriate.
There are always opinions and facts .......... both of them are relevant, since a thorough discussion of facts and opinions will nourish development and...
@manni
This quote
is the most interesting part, since that can be explained in a simple way : the cheaper licenses are often offered by "volume partners" and the more expensive licenses are often offered by either "greedy volume partners" (read: they overcharge) or "small partners" (read...
@mow,
Thank you for adding the more verbose version of what I hinted in rough outlines.
It is good to have this verbose version, since that text of yours is something that can and will add value in a legal sense.
In my world, this more "elaborate" and "legally fine-tuned" texts and...
@Hangover2,
In your last post, you challenged some of the statements that I made, for reasons not entirely clear.
The concluding statement was
and I simply do not grasp how you
a) can disagree with a conclusion from my side, if I do not intend to conclude at all, (and)
b) cannot...
@manni,
This statement
indicates that your "specialist" has either been given the wrong information or is not a "specialist".
The relevant legal facts here are that
a) damages can be claimed with any counterparty, in this case a supplier who is a reseller of some product,
b) market...
@Hangover2
The first reason simply illustrates the problem that I already identified : lower courts lack authority.
In essence and in daily practice, only EU institutes can enforce something - not to the full extent of applicable law, but "something".
So, not clear to me what your point...