CentOS 5.1 to 5.2 upgrade and Bind

[mdiberi]

I had similar issues in post http://forum.swsoft.com/showthread.php?t=51613&highlight=named after upgrading as sysconfig/named was not pointing to the proper directory for Plesk.

However, is it really necessary to remove bind-chroot as recommended? I have left it installed with no issues so far as it supposedly clashes with Plesk.

Thanks

 

[breun]

Yes, bind-chroot causes problems with Plesk, better remove it. Parallels even recommends excluding this package in your yum configuration: http://kb.odin.com/en/234 (Although I don't understand why they also recommend excluding kernel packages.)

 

[mdiberi]

Thanks for the reply. What about caching-nameserver?

 

[breun]

If you followed the instructions for installing Plesk (minimal OS install, install Plesk) then you shouldn't have either bind-chroot or caching-nameserver installed. Parallels recommends excluding them as they cause trouble. If you have them installed, better uninstall them.

 

[DerFalk]

I haven´t uninstall it, and my system works!

BTW: my maschine is a virtual...

 

[nickpick]

I haven´t uninstall it, and my system works!

BTW: my maschine is a virtual...

Doesn't make a difference if it is a VZ or not..
It is potentially dangerous to have it installed along with Plesk, which I can tell you from experience.