greylisting_filter reject's mail with Wrong HELO hostname

[hostfan]

---------------------------------------------------------------
PRODUCT, VERSION, OPERATING SYSTEM, ARCHITECTURE

Plesk Panel, 10.4.4 Update #18, Debian 6.0 (Squeeze), 64-bit

PROBLEM DESCRIPTION AND STEPS TO REPRODUCE

greylisting_filter reject mails from all peers that have HELO beginning with "localhost".


ACTUAL RESULT

Mail was rejeceted with 554 mail server permanently rejected message (#5.3.0)

/var/log/mail.log:
Feb 23 16:21:29 plesk greylisting filter[28405]: Starting greylisting filter...
Feb 23 16:21:29 plesk greylisting filter[28405]: Wrong HELO hostname: localhostx.DOMAIN.de
Feb 23 16:21:29 plesk qmail-queue-handlers[28385]: handlers_stderr: REJECT
Feb 23 16:21:29 plesk qmail-queue-handlers[28385]: REJECT during call 'grey' handler

reject also for:
localhost
localhost.domain.de
localhostxyz.domain.de

works normaly for something like that:
subsubdomain.localhost.domain.de

EXPECTED RESULT

Mail should be delivered normaly if the HELO hostname beginns with localhost and has a fully qualified domainname.

ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
--------------------------------------------------------------

 

[hostfan]

Anything done here?

 

[IgorG]

Try to use attached fix.

 

[hostfan]

Patch has no effect.

 

[IgorG]

Did you replaced /usr/local/psa/admin/plib/common_func.php3 file and restart psa service?

 

[hostfan]

Did you replaced /usr/local/psa/admin/plib/common_func.php3 file and restart psa service?

Yes, replaced and executes /etc/init.d/psa restart, no effect...

 

[IgorG]

Problem was fixed in MU#20.

 

[hostfan]

Problem was fixed in MU#20.

Applied MU#20, no change.
Mails from such hosts rejected...

 

[hostfan]

Any news here?

 

[hostfan]

Now we have MU#25, no change in behavior.

Theres any news to this Problem?

 

[IgorG]

http://kb.parallels.com/en/113722

 

[hostfan]

Hi Igor,

if you read the first post again, you see mailbox quota are not our problem and the last postet KB are not help us.

If there any news on this issue?