• If you are still using CentOS 7.9, it's time to convert to Alma 8 with the free centos2alma tool by Plesk or Plesk Migrator. Please let us know your experiences or concerns in this thread:
    CentOS2Alma discussion
  • Inviting everyone to the UX test of a new security feature in the WP Toolkit
    For WordPress site owners, threats posed by hackers are ever-present. Because of this, we are developing a new security feature for the WP Toolkit. If the topic of WordPress website security is relevant to you, we would be grateful if you could share your experience and help us test the usability of this feature. We invite you to join us for a 1-hour online session via Google Meet. Select a convenient meeting time with our friendly UX staff here.

Issue Milter SPF check times out on certain domains

Cappa

New Pleskian
Server operating system version
CentOS 7
Plesk version and microupdate number
Obsidian 18.0.45
Obsidian 18.0.45

Currently incoming mails from certain domains got stuck in the SPF milter check.
This happened suddenly, we are running this Plesk mail setup for over 3 years now.

The maillog shows this:

example 1 (google):
postfix/cleanup[22036]: warning: milter inet:127.0.0.1:12768: can't read SMFIC_BODYEOB reply packet header: Connection timed out
postfix/cleanup[22036]: 2535D40926: milter-reject: END-OF-MESSAGE from mail-lf1-f50.google.com[209.85.167.50]: 4.7.1 Service unavailable - try again later; from=<[email protected]> to=<[email protected]> proto=ESMTP helo=<mail-lf1-f50.google.com>

example 2 (microsoft):
postfix/cleanup[23472]: warning: milter inet:127.0.0.1:12768: can't read SMFIC_BODYEOB reply packet header: Connection timed out
postfix/cleanup[23472]: 577F7407F0: milter-reject: END-OF-MESSAGE from mail-dbaeur03on2105.outbound.protection.outlook.com[40.107.104.105]: 4.7.1 Service unavailable - try again later; from=<[email protected]> to=<[email protected]> proto=ESMTP helo=<EUR03-DBA-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com>

Disabling SPF in Plesk on incoming mails solves the problem for now, these mails end up in the mailbox after disabling.
Increasing the timeouts is not a possibility / real solution.

Anyone has seen this or can think of a possible solution?
 
Back
Top