Hello!
As known, whitelist entries can be set.
https://docs.plesk.com/en-US/obsidi...ide-black-and-white-lists.59436/Unfortunately, these seem to be processed only after defined lists (e.g. xbl.spamhaus.org).
If so-called freemailers are blocked in such a list (currently zen.spamhaus.org blocks e.g. gmx.de https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL594401 ),
the whole list must be removed. Moreover, you only become aware of this when it is "too late".
In the whitelist a defined list of positive addresses of the freemailer would be possible and the DNSBL service lists then sit for further behind it.
Would this be an improvement for SPAM handling?
As known, whitelist entries can be set.
https://docs.plesk.com/en-US/obsidi...ide-black-and-white-lists.59436/Unfortunately, these seem to be processed only after defined lists (e.g. xbl.spamhaus.org).
If so-called freemailers are blocked in such a list (currently zen.spamhaus.org blocks e.g. gmx.de https://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/query/SBL594401 ),
the whole list must be removed. Moreover, you only become aware of this when it is "too late".
In the whitelist a defined list of positive addresses of the freemailer would be possible and the DNSBL service lists then sit for further behind it.
Would this be an improvement for SPAM handling?