• Please be aware: Kaspersky Anti-Virus has been deprecated
    With the upgrade to Plesk Obsidian 18.0.64, "Kaspersky Anti-Virus for Servers" will be automatically removed from the servers it is installed on. We recommend that you migrate to Sophos Anti-Virus for Servers.
  • The Horde webmail has been deprecated. Its complete removal is scheduled for April 2025. For details and recommended actions, see the Feature and Deprecation Plan.
  • We’re working on enhancing the Monitoring feature in Plesk, and we could really use your expertise! If you’re open to sharing your experiences with server and website monitoring or providing feedback, we’d love to have a one-hour online meeting with you.

Question can i install Plesk on Raspberry arm with 2022.04

fl0645

New Pleskian
Server operating system version
Ubuntu 22.04.04
Plesk version and microupdate number
not yet
can i install Plesk on Raspberry arm with 2024.04,

thank you very much
 
Plesk supports ARM with Ubunutu 22.04, so technically you should be able to install it on a Raspberry I suppose. But it's not something we have tested.
 
when i try an automatic install : i have you are trying to run Plesk Installer on an unsupported os
 
Could you please provide a little bit more details, like how exactly you tried to install Plesk? What exactly error do you see (maybe some screenshots)?
 
Last edited:
lsb_release -a
no LSB modules are available
Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS

lINUX rASPEBRRYPI 5.15.0-1060-raspi #63-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Wed Jul 17 11.24.03 UTC 2024 armw71 GNU/Linux
 
after install lsb
LSB VERSION: core-11.1.0Ubuntu4-noarch:printing-11.1.0ubuntu04-noarch:security-11.1.0ubuntu4-noarch
 
hm... Here is what I get from my Raspberry Pi 4 (Model B Rev 1.2; currently, it is without Plesk),
Code:
$ uname -a
Linux home 5.15.0-1058-raspi #61-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Mon Jul 1 07:22:01 UTC 2024 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux

$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID:    Ubuntu
Description:    Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS
Release:    22.04
Codename:    jammy

The main difference I see is "armw71" vs. "aarch64" in the `uname -a` output. This is likely why the one-click-installer said the system is unsupported.
 
Back
Top