Facebook
Twitter
jorge ceballos
Regular Pleskian
Hi,
After upgrading to Plesk v. 10, mailman started delivering emails answering contributions to its different lists showing too much info and some typos. I completely ignore if this is due to qmail or mailman itself and/or if this replicates on postfix.
After the original message is sent and is delivered as expected and someone answers, this is what is delivered to each one of the members of the list:
From: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:29 PM
Subject: [test] (no subject)
To:
&+
Received: from mail-gy0-f179.google.com (xxx.xx.xxx.xx)
by domain.com with SMTP; 15 Nov 2010 23:28:58 -0600
Received: by gyg4 with SMTP id 4so107327gyg.10
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 21:29:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to
:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=29tPLUyV+DEpDH8WALP3VxVWRW65N+QZf9ZWc0SseuE=;
b=X1PUwqOd9p2bjkWoVm3y81LxYSJA2Hl7QCYN9UdTLI2uux2SPNih5QWi3UcAPTFAL3
dEIcdRAlhm0VuZhzB7Lj9bxAYuDuFUKoTBA0JdEW3PkLmll4CIptAWW32yWSX/a81hFe
fbaKVPDnnTJ2X9w30AeB6C5OlYM3ftgbVq/aY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
b=EQkFJqAz1wVLWOfA4vXD2waFnbitz4DRNcpj2bdaBn1DDq6Zm9mmZekaKoSIFCI4N7
OzzhtzeXJb5EmnC5fodYF0dJcPvjdexQMmo1CmOhU78KpQaVxiWDWz6sPWfy9K5GuVP2
BhPnNdolrmcxmty31HNefwbeEdo3A86biUzK4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by x.xxx.xxx.x with SMTP id g2mr10998207ybe.187.1289885363029; Mon,
15 Nov 2010 21:29:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by xx.xxx.xxx.xxx with HTTP; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 21:29:22 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAMUu19tupEtImEuz2vhcKOCihgAAEAAAAP1Au9OeAP1Jt9A0y9xaIQ4BAAAAAA==@domain.com>
References: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAMUu19tupEtImEuz2vhcKOCihgAAEAAAAIupI5BiX7tMpzkiEl+HpPcBAAAAAA==@domain.com>
<!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAMUu19tupEtImEuz2vhcKOCihgAAEAAAAP1Au9OeAP1Jt9A0y9xaIQ4BAAAAAA==@domain.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:29:22 -0600
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Test] TEST ...
From: John Doe <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd59e76dd4766049524d6f0
--000e0cd59e76dd4766049524d6f0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Was it fine this time?
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:18 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> lets see how's now
>
>
>
>
TIA,
Jorge
After upgrading to Plesk v. 10, mailman started delivering emails answering contributions to its different lists showing too much info and some typos. I completely ignore if this is due to qmail or mailman itself and/or if this replicates on postfix.
After the original message is sent and is delivered as expected and someone answers, this is what is delivered to each one of the members of the list:
From: <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:29 PM
Subject: [test] (no subject)
To:
&+
Received: from mail-gy0-f179.google.com (xxx.xx.xxx.xx)
by domain.com with SMTP; 15 Nov 2010 23:28:58 -0600
Received: by gyg4 with SMTP id 4so107327gyg.10
for <[email protected]>; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 21:29:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to
:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=29tPLUyV+DEpDH8WALP3VxVWRW65N+QZf9ZWc0SseuE=;
b=X1PUwqOd9p2bjkWoVm3y81LxYSJA2Hl7QCYN9UdTLI2uux2SPNih5QWi3UcAPTFAL3
dEIcdRAlhm0VuZhzB7Lj9bxAYuDuFUKoTBA0JdEW3PkLmll4CIptAWW32yWSX/a81hFe
fbaKVPDnnTJ2X9w30AeB6C5OlYM3ftgbVq/aY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
b=EQkFJqAz1wVLWOfA4vXD2waFnbitz4DRNcpj2bdaBn1DDq6Zm9mmZekaKoSIFCI4N7
OzzhtzeXJb5EmnC5fodYF0dJcPvjdexQMmo1CmOhU78KpQaVxiWDWz6sPWfy9K5GuVP2
BhPnNdolrmcxmty31HNefwbeEdo3A86biUzK4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by x.xxx.xxx.x with SMTP id g2mr10998207ybe.187.1289885363029; Mon,
15 Nov 2010 21:29:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by xx.xxx.xxx.xxx with HTTP; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 21:29:22 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAMUu19tupEtImEuz2vhcKOCihgAAEAAAAP1Au9OeAP1Jt9A0y9xaIQ4BAAAAAA==@domain.com>
References: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAMUu19tupEtImEuz2vhcKOCihgAAEAAAAIupI5BiX7tMpzkiEl+HpPcBAAAAAA==@domain.com>
<!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAMUu19tupEtImEuz2vhcKOCihgAAEAAAAP1Au9OeAP1Jt9A0y9xaIQ4BAAAAAA==@domain.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 23:29:22 -0600
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [Test] TEST ...
From: John Doe <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd59e76dd4766049524d6f0
--000e0cd59e76dd4766049524d6f0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Was it fine this time?
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:18 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> lets see how's now
>
>
>
>
TIA,
Jorge
