• If you are still using CentOS 7.9, it's time to convert to Alma 8 with the free centos2alma tool by Plesk or Plesk Migrator. Please let us know your experiences or concerns in this thread:
    CentOS2Alma discussion

Parallels Premium Outgoing Antispam - counting problem again

derde0

Basic Pleskian
Hi everyone,

the OA has problems to count outgoing messages or rather does not count messages at all.

I already follow the suggestions from http://kb.parallels.com/de/115257 and in fact something like
Code:
egrep "ctasd|ASVOD" /usr/local/psa/var/log/maillog | grep SenderID | egrep "Spam: NonSpam|Spam: Unknown|sClass: NonSpam|sClass: Unknown" | wc -l
shows up
Code:
63
.

But in the backend there are only zero this day - so counting can only be exercised over the console and not the backend.

I think the problem is ctoblogs.php around line 283 - because when i took an echo after the the if-Statement, the debug.log has no entry - but it should.

Could you from parallels or the guys from commtouch take a look and maybe also provide a workaround for this.

Thank you in advance

derde0
 
Hi,

no change until now. after checking all the proposals from here, i still get no correct numbers of -emails sending from the server. the counting processing in ctoblogs.php seems not working - because inspecting the logs (for today)i found this
Code:
[root@s2013]#  egrep "ctasd|ASVOD" /usr/local/psa/var/log/maillog | grep SenderID | egrep "Spam: NonSpam|Spam: Unknown|sClass: NonSpam|sClass: Unknown" | wc -l
9
[root@s2013]# egrep "ctasd|ASVOD" /usr/local/psa/var/log/maillog | grep SenderID | egrep "Spam: Confirmed|Spam: Bulk|sClass: Confirmed|sClass: Bulk" | wc -l 
1

and for the rest of the time:

Code:
root@s2013#  egrep "ctasd|ASVOD" /usr/local/psa/var/log/maillog.processed | grep SenderID | egrep "Spam: NonSpam|Spam: Unknown|sClass: NonSpam|sClass: Unknown" | wc -l
1792

root@s2013# egrep "ctasd|ASVOD" /usr/local/psa/var/log/maillog.processed | grep SenderID | egrep "Spam: Confirmed|Spam: Bulk|sClass: Confirmed|sClass: Bulk" | wc -l 
20

and this is the output in the backend:
Bildschirmfoto vom 2013-04-18 11:04:42.png

so please, dear support, igorG, ruslanT or sergeyL or who ever read this - please give me a hint or something else i can work with.

Regards derde0
 
Hi folks,

it could become a kind of game, posting facts about a bug that is not evil at all but annoying in every day business. still no changes - ctoblogs.php gibes false results or nothing and comandline-tools count mails correctly:

Code:
[root@*********]#  egrep "ctasd|ASVOD" /usr/local/psa/var/log/maillog.processed | grep SenderID | egrep "Spam: NonSpam|Spam: Unknown|sClass: NonSpam|sClass: Unknown" | wc -l
180
and
Code:
[root@***********]# egrep "ctasd|ASVOD" /usr/local/psa/var/log/maillog.processed | grep SenderID | egrep "Spam: Confirmed|Spam: Bulk|sClass: Confirmed|sClass: Bulk" | wc -l 
16

so, here we go again: could you please give it a try and help me with this not working statistic-tool.

thank you derde0
 
Last edited:
Hi Igor,

tanks for your reply. Here we go:

---------------------------------------------------------------
PRODUCT, VERSION, MICROUPDATE, OPERATING SYSTEM, ARCHITECTURE

Plesk Panel 11.09; #47, CentOS 6.4, 64-bit

PROBLEM DESCRIPTION

The Counting/Statistics of Parallels Premium Outgoing Spam does work. As you can see on the screenshot, there is no counting today and for the last week there are only a few mails counted.
Bildschirmfoto vom 2013-04-22 12:02:40.png

STEPS TO REPRODUCE
If i use the comandline-tools mentioned in http://kb.parallels.com/115257, i get the following numbers:

for maillog (today) and Spam (confirmed) - 3
for maillog (today) and no Spam (NonSpam) - 41

If go into the maillog 'maillog.processed' i get for NonSpam: 180
and for 'maillog.processed' and Spam: 16

I i followed the steps on recalculating stats the result on the plesk panel is equal.

debug.log says:

Code:
22-04-2013 12:01:02: Processing maillog
22-04-2013 12:01:02: Aggregating daily statistics
22-04-2013 12:01:02: Aggregating file /var/log/ctchob/2013/h2013042211
22-04-2013 12:01:02: Aggregating file /var/log/ctchob/2013/h2013042210
22-04-2013 12:01:02: Aggregating file /var/log/ctchob/2013/h2013042209
22-04-2013 12:01:02: Aggregating file /var/log/ctchob/2013/h2013042208
22-04-2013 12:01:02: Aggregating file /var/log/ctchob/2013/h2013042207
22-04-2013 12:01:02: Aggregating file /var/log/ctchob/2013/h2013042206
22-04-2013 12:01:02: Aggregating file /var/log/ctchob/2013/h2013042205
22-04-2013 12:01:02: Aggregating file /var/log/ctchob/2013/h2013042204
22-04-2013 12:01:02: Aggregating file /var/log/ctchob/2013/h2013042203
22-04-2013 12:01:02: Aggregating file /var/log/ctchob/2013/h2013042202
22-04-2013 12:01:02: Aggregating file /var/log/ctchob/2013/h2013042201
22-04-2013 12:01:02: Aggregating file /var/log/ctchob/2013/h2013042200
22-04-2013 12:01:02: Aggregating file /var/log/ctchob/2013/h2013042123
22-04-2013 12:01:02: Aggregating file /var/log/ctchob/2013/h2013042122
22-04-2013 12:01:02: Aggregating file /var/log/ctchob/2013/h2013042121
22-04-2013 12:01:02: Aggregating file /var/log/ctchob/2013/h2013042120
22-04-2013 12:01:02: Aggregating file /var/log/ctchob/2013/h2013042119
22-04-2013 12:01:02: Aggregating file /var/log/ctchob/2013/h2013042118
22-04-2013 12:01:02: Aggregating file /var/log/ctchob/2013/h2013042117
22-04-2013 12:01:02: Aggregating file /var/log/ctchob/2013/h2013042116
22-04-2013 12:01:02: Aggregating file /var/log/ctchob/2013/h2013042115
22-04-2013 12:01:02: Aggregating file /var/log/ctchob/2013/h2013042114
22-04-2013 12:01:02: Aggregating file /var/log/ctchob/2013/h2013042113
22-04-2013 12:01:02: Aggregating file /var/log/ctchob/2013/h2013042112
22-04-2013 12:01:02: Log parsing ended.

ACTUAL RESULT

Is as described in the Problem Description

EXPECTED RESULT

Parallels Premium Outgoing Spam should show in its stats in minimum 3 Spam-Mails and 41 NonSpam-Mails. Forthermore it should show 180 NonSpam-Mails and 16 Spam-Mails for the week.

ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

I did some debuging of ctoblogs.php - because the service is working (ctasd)

Code:
Apr 22 12:04:54 servant ct-milter[6202]: [ASVOD] OUT IP: 127.0.0.1, Sender(Auth): [email protected](null)), Spam: Unknown, VOD: Unknown, RefID: str=0001.0A0C0204.51750B32.0043:SCFSTAT3921977,ss=1,re=-4.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,vtr=str,vl=0,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0, Action: tag, QueueId: 765431781011, SenderID: 127.0.0.1, Flags: 0, TMsg: 1, TSpam: 0, TSus: 0, TVirus: 0
Apr 22 12:06:31 servant ct-milter[6202]: [ASVOD] OUT IP: 127.0.0.1, Sender(Auth): [email protected]((null)), Spam: Unknown, VOD: Unknown, RefID: str=0001.0A0C0205.51750B93.0085:SCFSTAT20563094,ss=1,re=-4.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0, Action: tag, QueueId: A4D5117810B9, SenderID: 127.0.0.1, Flags: 0, TMsg: 2, TSpam: 0, TSus: 0, TVirus: 0
Apr 22 12:18:13 servant ct-milter[6202]: [ASVOD] OUT IP: 127.0.0.1, Sender(Auth): [email protected]((null)), Spam: Unknown, VOD: Unknown, RefID: str=0001.0A0C0207.51750E50.0149,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0, Action: tag, QueueId: EDD711781010, SenderID: 127.0.0.1, Flags: 0, TMsg: 1, TSpam: 0, TSus: 0, TVirus: 0
Apr 22 12:18:36 servant ct-milter[6202]: [ASVOD] OUT IP: 127.0.0.1, Sender(Auth): [email protected]((null)), Spam: Suspect, VOD: Unknown, RefID: str=0001.0A0C0201.51750E68.002F,ss=2,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=2,cld=1,fgs=0, Action: tag, QueueId: 81877178109C, SenderID: 127.0.0.1, Flags: 0, TMsg: 2, TSpam: 0, TSus: 0, TVirus: 0

i put some comments around line 283 and i get in debug.log - nothing, especially inside of the if-statements.
--------------------------------------------------------------

So hope that helps for any additional informations - i am glad to hear from you.

cio derde0
 
Could you please post here output of commands:

# ls -la /var/log/ctchob/last*
# cat /var/log/ctchob/lastday.stats
 
Could you please post here output of commands:

# ls -la /var/log/ctchob/last*

lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 22. Apr 13:01 /var/log/ctchob/lastday.stats -> /var/log/ctchob/2013/d2013042212
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 10 22. Apr 13:01 /var/log/ctchob/lastepoch
lrwxrwxrwx 1 psaadm psaadm 30 22. Apr 01:01 /var/log/ctchob/lastweek.stats -> /var/log/ctchob/2013/w20130422

# cat /var/log/ctchob/lastday.stats

[root@************]# ls -la /var/log/ctchob/last*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 22. Apr 13:01 /var/log/ctchob/lastday.stats -> /var/log/ctchob/2013/d2013042212
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 10 22. Apr 13:01 /var/log/ctchob/lastepoch
lrwxrwxrwx 1 psaadm psaadm 30 22. Apr 01:01 /var/log/ctchob/lastweek.stats -> /var/log/ctchob/2013/w20130422

[root@*******************]# cat /var/log/ctchob/lastday.stats
Spam,0,0,0,0,0
Virus,0,0,0,0,0
 
Hello, derde0.
Did you try to apply workaround from this post - point 3.2?
Could you post output of:
# grep '$prevdateh=date("YmdH",$lastepoch);' /opt/ctch/ctoblogs.php
 
Hi Ruslan,

yes, i did all the stuff (wait about 1 day and check the results continuously. No change.

[root@****************]# grep '$prevdateh=date("YmdH",$lastepoch);' /opt/ctch/ctoblogs.php
$prevdateh=date("YmdH",$lastepoch);

cio derde0
 
Please comment-out this line:
[root@****************]# grep '$prevdateh=date("YmdH",$lastepoch);' /opt/ctch/ctoblogs.php
//$prevdateh=date("YmdH",$lastepoch);
it should help.
 
Hi Ruslan,

here we go again.
Bildschirmfoto vom 2013-04-23 09:50:28.png
This is the statistic from today with //$prevdateh=date("YmdH",$lastepoch); as you recommended.

So nothing really new.

What's next?

Cio derde0
 
What's next?

I think that this issue should be investigated directly on your server. Therefore I suggest you contact Support Team. Experienced supporters will check it and report a bug if necessary.
 
Hi Igor,

contacting the support-team. You mean https://www.parallels.com/support/request/? Well Parallels Premium Outgoing Spam is not mentioned in the list - but it is a product of Parallels, isn't it?

Maybe you could open a ticket for me, because all the problems i described so far are all in all located on a installation with no modification to plesk panel or Parallels Premium Outgoing Spam. So, it is a bug. Or is there a customer with no problems on Parallels Premium Outgoing Spam? Maybe i can duplicate his configuration. I would because my only aim is that this modul will work as expected.

Thank derde0
 
Hi everybody and especially the supporters from Parallels,

after investigating the Support-Request-Form and recognize that i have to pay for reporting a bug, i think Parallels should clearly state out that customers have to pay for reporting a bug. In Germany we would say "Das würde ich gern schriftlich haben." (I would like to get this in written form.).

Well, i like the Plesk Panel but in my opinion it is a bit beside of the track that the reports of some customers about the malfunction of a particular product are ignored in way that if these customers won't pay for support there is no support whether he is paying for the product or not (and the costs for the panel are lower than for the Outgoing Spam Module).

So maybe you can think about and there is a better way for both than closing the contract.

cio derde0
 
I see that you are registered on the forum recently. I think the only this can explain what you write above.
I write it here many-many times, but I'll write again. If support confirm that your report is really describes bug in our product - you will be refunded for your ticket. If it is misconfiguration or something else on your server - you pay for the work to fix your problem.
 
Back
Top