A
AbsolutelyFreeW
Guest
First I noticed the logs in the log manager were inadequate, so I went to IIS to see if I ciould make it to include more fields, then I found out, IIS made excellent logging, but they are not shown, plesk is doing its own logging.
Now I'm really confused. Isn't this waste of resources?? Evey hit on the server results in logging in two places.
Why is plesk implementing a services that already is there by the web server with much more flexibility? Why not just make it possible to configure IIS logging for the stie through the control panel??
My impression of plesk is that it provides means of control for the underlying software, I don't see why it in this case has gone its own way.. I can understand that the way of implementation is different between OSs, and capabilities of apache may be different, never the less making a new log results in unnecessary overhead compared to letting the web servers handle this on their own, and just show them in the control panel...
Now I'm really confused. Isn't this waste of resources?? Evey hit on the server results in logging in two places.
Why is plesk implementing a services that already is there by the web server with much more flexibility? Why not just make it possible to configure IIS logging for the stie through the control panel??
My impression of plesk is that it provides means of control for the underlying software, I don't see why it in this case has gone its own way.. I can understand that the way of implementation is different between OSs, and capabilities of apache may be different, never the less making a new log results in unnecessary overhead compared to letting the web servers handle this on their own, and just show them in the control panel...