B
bgoosen
Guest
Hi!
I recently installed psa-qmail-rblsmtpd to allow Blackhole filtering from Spamhaus for our small business' email and webserver.
We've had a few regular corresponders complain of bounce messages. I can't tell that something went wrong with the Blackhole filtering or if the problem is unrelated. It looks to me like it's failing on the domainkey failure, but I'm not sure, as I'm very much a novice. Can anyone share their opinion?
Here's a chunk of the bounce message. Note the lack of any description in the error message between the intended recipient and "--- Below this line is a copy of the message."
Here's the portion of the mail log (with account names edited) corresponding to that time.
Is my suspicion right, or am I misunderstanding things?
I recently installed psa-qmail-rblsmtpd to allow Blackhole filtering from Spamhaus for our small business' email and webserver.
We've had a few regular corresponders complain of bounce messages. I can't tell that something went wrong with the Blackhole filtering or if the problem is unrelated. It looks to me like it's failing on the domainkey failure, but I'm not sure, as I'm very much a novice. Can anyone share their opinion?
Here's a chunk of the bounce message. Note the lack of any description in the error message between the intended recipient and "--- Below this line is a copy of the message."
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Mon, February 1, 2010 1:36:42 PM
Subject: failure notice
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at ourserver.com..
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
<[email protected]>:
--- Below this line is a copy of the message.
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: (qmail 31853 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2010 13:36:42 -0600
Received: from n63.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (98.136.44.33)
by oursever.com with SMTP; 1 Feb 2010 13:36:42 -0600
Received-SPF: pass (ourserver.com: local policy designates 98.136.44.33 as permitted sender)
Received: from [216.252.122.218] by n63.bullet.mail.sp1..yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Feb 2010 19:36:10 -0000
Received: from [68.142..237.87] by t3.bullet.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Feb 2010 19:36:10 -0000
Received: from [66.196.114.79] by t3.bullet.re3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Feb 2010 19:36:10 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp308.mail.re3.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Feb 2010 19:36:10 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: [email protected]
Received: (qmail 99528 invoked by uid 60001); 1 Feb 2010 19:36:10 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1265052970; bh=AVJmE9LlOeTvtTRkln9hNW8H+fOVk/K8I444Gvl07NQ=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Referencesate:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=6TfLeWm29a/uiqyNLYHOc9debUzn7qRAnmn6xKeEezpz+vgroUuKJzmePCwINqp1wmy3BcfxsAZBliFg1TsisaekjXlWvTjrpFM/ARthHNM2BJ2OmejIS+F8tAzeXUQttpsKTDllJzz2ABYCbaXaz0EPaaIy+VvzWKilunrzcBY=
DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Referencesate:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
b=silhSfWNBuQ3uCSTXIJ2IaEkED1QNEH9a5sqFBot/lI7T26SY3NFVf/9/cu5cjpD9Wow3YLZOZU+mwfPOSQBc1BPyxypCdoKJtlFDX1iDtsk7CdDQFjd7LGbO6iKBaercwGTTnp0uL4GRzXsV2szb4oRCArv35iGrnx3pWboxNU=;
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
X-YMail-OSG: Ldpj.vcVM1mHErjKI8UI1hZG5u8zC1_RqogcQLta.AIkHJdpWivdOuRKgT72frEKPS26iaYJixC0KAyeefgueG7tcjuCTTOfPFbbLpBjM5Plw7XqvxYt0g6sMN5jP9ZVWlS.F17QmtxoeAbssCSwt7lGBt6bvcahLQYrXsSgcuCWyXOkMNgbyZx2keUgiTiMUAM_MlzrV8761uhHYU9stovK7bAUesy9aMoKyt8y9Wwp.Xg62MA6divySy80m.VbSv1qUof91i7z6U8AkfdcgVg0b_BlrxO2E0e1kSQB2QRUfKhyjurBBKy.iRJPPKsiOzUR1N61UINzkBaVfld41C3TmWNPACotVYsS
Received: from [76.250.89.189] by web55805.mail..re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 11:36:09 PST
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/272.7 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964
References: <[email protected]>
Here's the portion of the mail log (with account names edited) corresponding to that time.
Feb 1 13:36:41 adminstrator relaylock: /var/qmail/bin/relaylock: mail from 98.136.44.33:48913 (n63.bullet.mail.sp1.yahoo.com)
Feb 1 13:36:42 adminstrator qmail-queue-handlers[31850]: Handlers Filter before-queue for qmail started ...
Feb 1 13:36:42 adminstrator qmail-queue-handlers[31850]: [email protected]
Feb 1 13:36:42 adminstrator qmail-queue-handlers[31850]: [email protected]
Feb 1 13:36:42 adminstrator qmail-queue-handlers[31850]: hook_dir = '/var/qmail//handlers/before-queue'
Feb 1 13:36:42 adminstrator qmail-queue-handlers[31850]: recipient[3] = '[email protected]'
Feb 1 13:36:42 adminstrator qmail-queue-handlers[31850]: handlers dir = '/var/qmail//handlers/before-queue/recipient/[email protected]'
Feb 1 13:36:42 adminstrator qmail-queue-handlers[31850]: starter: submitter[31853] exited normally
Feb 1 13:36:42 adminstrator qmail: 1265053002.531412 new msg 50760210
Feb 1 13:36:42 adminstrator qmail: 1265053002.531508 info msg 50760210: bytes 7676 from <[email protected]> qp 31853 uid 2020
Feb 1 13:36:42 adminstrator qmail: 1265053002.534408 starting delivery 190: msg 50760210 to local [email protected]
Feb 1 13:36:42 adminstrator qmail: 1265053002.534536 status: local 1/10 remote 0/20
Feb 1 13:36:42 adminstrator qmail-local-handlers[31855]: Handlers Filter before-local for qmail started ...
Feb 1 13:36:42 adminstrator qmail-local-handlers[31855]: [email protected]
Feb 1 13:36:42 adminstrator qmail-local-handlers[31855]: [email protected]
Feb 1 13:36:42 adminstrator qmail-local-handlers[31855]: domainkeys-handler exited with status 13
Feb 1 13:36:42 adminstrator qmail-local-handlers[31855]: call_handlers: stop call handlers because handler 'dd52-domainkeys' not PASS (31)
Feb 1 13:36:42 adminstrator qmail-local-handlers[31855]: call_handlers: stop call handlers from dir '/var/qmail//handlers/before-local/global'
Feb 1 13:36:42 adminstrator qmail: 1265053002.556550 delivery 190: failure:
Feb 1 13:36:42 adminstrator qmail: 1265053002.574578 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
Feb 1 13:36:42 adminstrator qmail-queue-handlers[31863]: Handlers Filter before-queue for qmail started ...
Feb 1 13:36:42 adminstrator qmail-queue-handlers[31863]: from=
Feb 1 13:36:42 adminstrator qmail-queue-handlers[31863]: [email protected]
Feb 1 13:36:42 adminstrator qmail-queue-handlers[31863]: hook_dir = '/var/qmail//handlers/before-queue'
Feb 1 13:36:42 adminstrator qmail-queue-handlers[31863]: recipient[3] = '[email protected]'
Feb 1 13:36:42 adminstrator qmail-queue-handlers[31863]: handlers dir = '/var/qmail//handlers/before-queue/recipient/[email protected]'
Feb 1 13:36:42 adminstrator qmail-queue-handlers[31863]: starter: submitter[31864] exited normally
Feb 1 13:36:42 adminstrator qmail: 1265053002.612846 bounce msg 50760210 qp 31863
Feb 1 13:36:42 adminstrator qmail: 1265053002.612958 end msg 50760210
Feb 1 13:36:42 adminstrator qmail: 1265053002.644317 new msg 50760216
Feb 1 13:36:42 adminstrator qmail: 1265053002.644482 info msg 50760216: bytes 8197 from <> qp 31864 uid 2522
Feb 1 13:36:42 adminstrator qmail: 1265053002.648073 starting delivery 191: msg 50760216 to remote [email protected]
Feb 1 13:36:42 adminstrator qmail: 1265053002.648241 status: local 0/10 remote 1/20
Feb 1 13:36:42 adminstrator qmail-remote-handlers[31866]: Handlers Filter before-remote for qmail started ...
Feb 1 13:36:42 adminstrator qmail-remote-handlers[31866]: from=
Feb 1 13:36:42 adminstrator qmail-remote-handlers[31866]: [email protected]
Feb 1 13:36:46 adminstrator qmail: 1265053006.344542 delivery 191: success: 74.6.136.65_accepted_message./Remote_host_said:_250_ok_dirdel/
Feb 1 13:36:46 adminstrator qmail: 1265053006.344755 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
Feb 1 13:36:46 adminstrator qmail: 1265053006.344856 end msg 50760216
Is my suspicion right, or am I misunderstanding things?