• If you are still using CentOS 7.9, it's time to convert to Alma 8 with the free centos2alma tool by Plesk or Plesk Migrator. Please let us know your experiences or concerns in this thread:
    CentOS2Alma discussion
  • Inviting everyone to the UX test of a new security feature in the WP Toolkit
    For WordPress site owners, threats posed by hackers are ever-present. Because of this, we are developing a new security feature for the WP Toolkit. If the topic of WordPress website security is relevant to you, we would be grateful if you could share your experience and help us test the usability of this feature. We invite you to join us for a 1-hour online session via Google Meet. Select a convenient meeting time with our friendly UX staff here.

RFC 2142 and Plesk: Auto-define abuse@<domain> for every domain

B_P

Regular Pleskian
Dear all,

RFC 2142 (https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2142.txt) requires the existence of abuse@<top-level-domain> addresses. So far, I cannot see that this is implemented when setting up domains with Plesk.
However, postmaster@<top-level-domain> is automatically setup as requested by RFC 822. Is there any plan to also implement the requirement of RFC 2142?
 
Hello,

These e-mails are created by Postfix, not Plesk during domain creation.

The issue reported is a Feature Request. It cannot be fixed without the source code interference. Please provide your suggestion for new functionality on User Voice:

https://plesk.uservoice.com/forums/184549-feature-suggestions

The top-ranked suggestions are likely to be included in the next versions of Plesk.
 
@B_P and @Kate,

The [email protected] and/or [email protected] is not something that should be dealt with by Plesk and/or by mail servers, associated with Plesk.

The RFCs in question only require ONE postmaster/abuse mailaddress to be existent: it is not required to have them on every domain!

In essence, creation of postmaster/abuse addresses at domain creation would lead to multiple addresses and, more important, the sysadmin not receiving them, if he is not the owner of the subscription associated with the domain.

In short, a bad idea and very bad implementation of the concerning RFCs, when allowing automatic postmaster/abuse address creation whenever a domain is created.

Regards....
 
Back
Top