- Server operating system version
- Windows Server 2019
- Plesk version and microupdate number
- Plesk Obsidian v18.0.57_build20231205.06 os_Windows 2012/2016/2019/2022
We've been using Plesk for quite awhile now and the WP Toolkit regularly.
What we have been doing is using the CLONE site feature to "roll out" our dev site to our production site.
From time to time we will clone in the other direction to give the dev site a "clean starting point".
Today while looking for something else in the _posts table for one of our Editors, I ran across something odd.
The _posts table in our dev site has entries in the guid field for all 3 of our various sites prototype, dev and our production site.
So, question is... isn't the WP Toolkit supposed to replace the database on the destination of a clone.
From what we are seeing it isn't really a merge operation either.
If I look at the _posts table of the 3 sites, the counts in the guid field are entirely different across the 3 databases.
We are having SEVERE speed issues on all 3 of those sites, and trying to track down possible causes.
Seeing that the "production" site has guid entries for the "dev" site, I can see that causing problems potentially.
Counts based on contents of "guid" field of _posts table
PRODUCTION DATABASE
575 entries for https Production site URL
1066 entries for https Dev site URL
115 entries for https Prototype site URL
0 entries for http Production site URL
156 entries for http Dev site URL
0 entries for http Prototype site URL
DEV DATABASE
473 entries for https Production site URL
255 entries for https Dev site URL
2319 entries for https Prototype site URL
0 entries for http Production site URL
156 entries for http Dev site URL
0 entries for http Prototype site URL
PROTOTYPE DATABASE
280 entries for https Production site URL
211 entries for https Dev site URL
2498 entries for https Prototype site URL
0 entries for http Production site URL
156 entries for http Dev site URL
0 entries for http Prototype site URL
I thought "maybe" revisions??? So installed the typical Optimize Database after blah blah blah... ran it with a 0 setting for revisions and the counts didn't change at all.
Just doesn't seem right that I should have addresses from dev and proto in production and vice versa.
Any thoughts ?
What we have been doing is using the CLONE site feature to "roll out" our dev site to our production site.
From time to time we will clone in the other direction to give the dev site a "clean starting point".
Today while looking for something else in the _posts table for one of our Editors, I ran across something odd.
The _posts table in our dev site has entries in the guid field for all 3 of our various sites prototype, dev and our production site.
So, question is... isn't the WP Toolkit supposed to replace the database on the destination of a clone.
From what we are seeing it isn't really a merge operation either.
If I look at the _posts table of the 3 sites, the counts in the guid field are entirely different across the 3 databases.
We are having SEVERE speed issues on all 3 of those sites, and trying to track down possible causes.
Seeing that the "production" site has guid entries for the "dev" site, I can see that causing problems potentially.
Counts based on contents of "guid" field of _posts table
PRODUCTION DATABASE
575 entries for https Production site URL
1066 entries for https Dev site URL
115 entries for https Prototype site URL
0 entries for http Production site URL
156 entries for http Dev site URL
0 entries for http Prototype site URL
DEV DATABASE
473 entries for https Production site URL
255 entries for https Dev site URL
2319 entries for https Prototype site URL
0 entries for http Production site URL
156 entries for http Dev site URL
0 entries for http Prototype site URL
PROTOTYPE DATABASE
280 entries for https Production site URL
211 entries for https Dev site URL
2498 entries for https Prototype site URL
0 entries for http Production site URL
156 entries for http Dev site URL
0 entries for http Prototype site URL
I thought "maybe" revisions??? So installed the typical Optimize Database after blah blah blah... ran it with a 0 setting for revisions and the counts didn't change at all.
Just doesn't seem right that I should have addresses from dev and proto in production and vice versa.
Any thoughts ?