• If you are still using CentOS 7.9, it's time to convert to Alma 8 with the free centos2alma tool by Plesk or Plesk Migrator. Please let us know your experiences or concerns in this thread:
    CentOS2Alma discussion
  • Inviting everyone to the UX test of a new security feature in the WP Toolkit
    For WordPress site owners, threats posed by hackers are ever-present. Because of this, we are developing a new security feature for the WP Toolkit. If the topic of WordPress website security is relevant to you, we would be grateful if you could share your experience and help us test the usability of this feature. We invite you to join us for a 1-hour online session via Google Meet. Select a convenient meeting time with our friendly UX staff here.

non-www version recommended... why?

JohanSki

Basic Pleskian
I read this in the Plesk manual:

Typically, any website is available on two URLs: with the www prefix (like in www.example.com) and without it (like in example.com). We recommend that you always redirect visitors to one of these URLs (typically to the non-www version).
Why does Plesk recommend the non-www version?
 
1. www is an atavism
2. existence or absence of www is doesn't matter for Google or other search engines
3. redirect from/to www is necessary just for backward compatibility. One user prefer domain names with www and other - without.
 
>> 1. www is an atavism

Wow... that's the first time I hear the word "atavism". It is like something old people don't need anymore?
 
Back
Top