K
knocx
Guest
We all know Qmail is quite old standalone, "expecially psa-qmail" lacks a lot of core patches required for effective relay and spam control
Since psa-qmail src rpm is not distributed by SwSoft with each update we are forced to deal with re-patching, re-packaging Qmail. This takes too much time.
We pay more than 6000 Euro / year to SwSoft , and still spending hours to configure the VERY old qmail with each update on our servers. Why do we have have to reconfigure things and still pay??
1- I suggest plesk to switch the MTA to postfix, All acounts are stored on DB and this should only take 1-2 weeks of development time at most!
Or
2- PLEASE include qmail patches such as badmailto maxrcpt ..etc with psa-qmail distribution. patching is a 20 minutes thing before packaging why dont you do this?? Why dont you include these patches.
Or
3- If you cant do above at least release psa-qmail source rpm. instead of releasing plesk-patches. thanks to art qmail source rpms , providing psa-qmail spec, and other useful 3rd part add-ons. Swsoft should "PAY" Scott of ART because he is the one saving plesks *** with his contributions. HOWEVER PLESK is a PAID software not a community release!!
We are already looking for alterntives to PLESK, we will dump PLESK immediately once find a good replacement Unfortunately CPanel , interfaces is not so good...
Since psa-qmail src rpm is not distributed by SwSoft with each update we are forced to deal with re-patching, re-packaging Qmail. This takes too much time.
We pay more than 6000 Euro / year to SwSoft , and still spending hours to configure the VERY old qmail with each update on our servers. Why do we have have to reconfigure things and still pay??
1- I suggest plesk to switch the MTA to postfix, All acounts are stored on DB and this should only take 1-2 weeks of development time at most!
Or
2- PLEASE include qmail patches such as badmailto maxrcpt ..etc with psa-qmail distribution. patching is a 20 minutes thing before packaging why dont you do this?? Why dont you include these patches.
Or
3- If you cant do above at least release psa-qmail source rpm. instead of releasing plesk-patches. thanks to art qmail source rpms , providing psa-qmail spec, and other useful 3rd part add-ons. Swsoft should "PAY" Scott of ART because he is the one saving plesks *** with his contributions. HOWEVER PLESK is a PAID software not a community release!!
We are already looking for alterntives to PLESK, we will dump PLESK immediately once find a good replacement Unfortunately CPanel , interfaces is not so good...