• If you are still using CentOS 7.9, it's time to convert to Alma 8 with the free centos2alma tool by Plesk or Plesk Migrator. Please let us know your experiences or concerns in this thread:
    CentOS2Alma discussion

Forwarded to devs CGrpus change CPU Limit over 999 it does not work

B4c4rd1

Regular Pleskian
TITLE:
CGroups change CPU Limit over 999 it does not work
PRODUCT, VERSION, OPERATING SYSTEM, ARCHITECTURE:
Plesk Onyx, Version 17.5.3 Update #21, Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS‬, x64
PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:
It is not possible to set CGroups cpu limit higher than 999.

You can only enter 3 digits.​
STEPS TO REPRODUCE:
Try to enter more than 3 digits​
ACTUAL RESULT:
Only 3 digits can be entered​
EXPECTED RESULT:
A minimum of 4 digits should be entered for example 1200​
ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
YOUR EXPECTATIONS FROM PLESK SERVICE TEAM:
Confirm bug
 
Last edited:
EXPECTED RESULT:
A minimum of 4 digits should be entered for example 1200
Cgroups Manager (Linux)
If the server has multiple CPU cores, the available CPU amount is equal to 100% * the number of CPU cores. For example, if your server has 4 CPU cores, the available CPU amount is 400%.
Sorry, but could you please confirm that your server really has 12 CPU cores?
Are you sure that "A minimum of 4 digits should be entered" is really necessary? This means that you need to have >=10 CPU cores.
 
Yes! 12 cores (2 sockets) 24 threads with intel. Next server comes with 2 sockets and 2 threadripper.
 
Why rare?

Here is apparently a communication error. CGroups works with CPU-threads. 100% power = theoretically 1 thread, distributed to all existing threads. (Plesk CGroups)

You can test it yourself.

Examples that are not rare now:

Intel® Xeon® E5-1650 v3 Hexa-Core Haswell, with 12 threads (6 cores) the possibility to enter 1200%.

AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Octa-Core "Summit Ridge" (Zen), with 16 threads (8 cores) the possibility to enter 1600%.

With a Ryzen CPU is now about € 70,21 monthly.

All with a single socket.

This is the future, or is it already the future? Is Plesk a future product? :p
 
Last edited:
Why rare?

[...]

Examples that are not rare now:

Intel® Xeon® E5-1650 v3 Hexa-Core Haswell, with 12 threads (6 cores) the possibility to enter 1200%.

AMD Ryzen 7 1700X Octa-Core "Summit Ridge" (Zen), with 16 threads (8 cores) the possibility to enter 1600%.

Hi,

The question is actually not about the existence of CPUs that support 12+ threads (we know they exist), the question is about your business case: what are you trying to accomplish by entering 1200% as a CPU limit for a subscription? This basically amounts to setting the CPU limit to Unlimited -- and Unlimited checkbox is already available. Can you tell us more about your scenario?
 
Hi,

What do we use the plugin for?

1. Quite simply, I use the plugin in principle for it that no 100% cpu-utilization comes when a customer takes a DDoS attack.

2. You can always have incorrect Wordpress plugins installed. If this plugin would take full advantage of the CPU, all customers on the server would be affected. Therefore, for us unlimited is not an option.

3. In addition, we offer packages where the customer can adjust the CPU limit himself. Of course for a certain extra charge.

We have a capacity of 3200%, why can I then give a customer only 999%? That does not yet illuminate me. The 1200% were just one example. The plugin-limit is 999%.

Many thanks for your help!
 
@custer

we found another bug with this adjustment.

We get the following error message when restoring backups:
Code:
Execution of /opt/psa/admin/plib/api-cli/domain_pref.php --update XXX -cgroups_cpu_usage 150 -ignore-nonexistent-options failed with return code 1. Stderr is Cannot update domain: Wrong syntax for command's '-cgroups_cpu_usage' parameter. '150' does not match the pattern '/^(-1|(?:100|[1-9][0-9]?)[%]?)$/i'.
 
Back
Top