• If you are still using CentOS 7.9, it's time to convert to Alma 8 with the free centos2alma tool by Plesk or Plesk Migrator. Please let us know your experiences or concerns in this thread:
    CentOS2Alma discussion

Resolved Plesk Onyx Preview and FeedBack

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's recommended to production ?

Short answer: No. Longer answer: while Plesk Onyx is more or less feature-complete now, we're still fixing bugs and polishing the new features. We strongly suggest you to wait until the middle of October for Plesk Onyx RTM -- it's only a month away.
 
hi fellas, i got this on a fresh centos 7 (without plesk)
should i install 12 and upgarde to 17?


sh: /etc/init.d/psa: No such file or directory

ERROR: Failed to run the Yum utility.
The Yum utility failed to install the required packages.
Attention! Your software might be inoperable.
Please, contact product technical support


Code:
YumTestTransactionError: Test Transaction Errors:   file /etc/httpd/conf.d/fcgid.conf fro
m install of psa-mod_fcgid-2.3.9.1-centos7.15121414.x86_64 conflicts with file from packa
ge mod_fcgid-2.3.9-4.el7.x86_64
  file /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/mod_fcgid.conf from install of psa-mod_fcgid-2.3.9.1-centos7.1
5121414.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mod_fcgid-2.3.9-4.el7.x86_64
  file /usr/lib64/httpd/modules/mod_fcgid.so from install of psa-mod_fcgid-2.3.9.1-centos
7.15121414.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mod_fcgid-2.3.9-4.el7.x86_64
 
Hi hardbrasil,

should i install 12 and upgarde to 17?
This is not necessary.

Pls. have a CLOSER look at your error message. As you can see, Plesk wants to install his own mod_fcgid ( psa-mod_fcgid and psa-mod-fcgid-configurator depend on each other ) , so either consider to remove the old package, or consider to force the installation with for example "rpm". ;)
 
Is the docker catalog meant to be empty?

Yeah, it's a known limitation. Right now you need to search for something and corresponding images will show up. We're planning to add browseable image catalog in one of the Plesk Onyx updates.
 
totally agree that it needs to be done relying on 14.x is troublesome for other services that require 16.x to run would like to see before RTM in october for it to be installed on 16.x

Plesk Onyx will support Ubuntu 16.04, don't worry. We plan to release another Plesk Onyx preview this week and it should have Ubuntu 16.04 support. Watch out for the announcements!
 
Send feedback. The document you are reading is for Plesk Onyx which is currently in development. The preview is meant only to demonstrate the new features.
 
Hi fellas, how can i sent reports?

i got this when installing ruby by extension catalog


Error: Failed to install the extension:
Execution of /usr/local/psa/admin/plib/modules/ruby/scripts/post-install.php failed with exit code 1 and the output:

Code:
Error: Failed to install the extension:

Execution of /usr/local/psa/admin/plib/modules/ruby/scripts/post-install.php failed with exit code 1 and the output:


[2016-09-13 10:57:36] ERR [panel] {}
ERROR:rubymng:[Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/var/lib/rbenv/versions/'
:
0: /usr/local/psa/admin/plib/modules/ruby/library/RubyManager.php:58
    PleskExt\Ruby\RubyManager::_call(array, boolean true)
1: /usr/local/psa/admin/plib/modules/ruby/library/RubyManager.php:12
    PleskExt\Ruby\RubyManager::getHandlers()
2: /usr/local/psa/admin/plib/modules/ruby/library/Repository/HandlerRepository.php:15
    PleskExt\Ruby\Repository\HandlerRepository::scan()
3: /usr/local/psa/admin/plib/modules/ruby/scripts/post-install.php:11
ERROR: pm_Exception: {}
ERROR:rubymng:[Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/var/lib/rbenv/versions/'
 (RubyManager.php:58)
 
Hi hardbrasil,

Error: Failed to install the extension:
Execution of /usr/local/psa/admin/plib/modules/ruby/scripts/post-install.php failed with exit code 1

As workaround you can remove Ruby Manager extension and install it again on Extensions Management page in Plesk.

Does this help? If not, pls. post as well your operating system for further investigations and solutions/suggestions.
 
Does this help? If not, pls. post as well your operating system for further investigations and solutions/suggestions.[/QUOTE]

works! thanks.
just for record, the first installation was by Extension manager.
 
Hi, I have been trying to setup DKIM and here is what google says about my email

dkim=temperror (no key for signature) [email protected];

From DKIMvalidator.com
Code:
DKIM Signature


Message contains this DKIM Signature:
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=domain.com; s=default;
    t=1473834561; bh=kyCM3OM48P64yDltuIKnAFdDzlI7igkbT3TGTusiVWw=; l=18;
    h=From:To:Subject;
    b=ZsnpWybaFidIq6mQluQ3JLbf1K+XAktJ94YbaoZdHerJk6G2fGNp75wGM+2UXI5SA
     /HdQT0EwxixU83WJSfupoBQoCI1Pto3bRZczQNTtN1d39IT6vexPy7cQT1TXvs8q/g
     dNAJgrGzFSrb+ExKl1Cu9/EVTGMbvFYeOJSajRiw=


Signature Information:
v= Version:         1
a= Algorithm:       rsa-sha256
c= Method:          simple/simple
d= Domain:          cyberlite.co
s= Selector:        default
q= Protocol:      
bh=                 kyCM3OM48P64yDltuIKnAFdDzlI7igkbT3TGTusiVWw=
h= Signed Headers:  From:To:Subject
b= Data:            ZsnpWybaFidIq6mQluQ3JLbf1K+XAktJ94YbaoZdHerJk6G2fGNp75wGM+2UXI5SA
     /HdQT0EwxixU83WJSfupoBQoCI1Pto3bRZczQNTtN1d39IT6vexPy7cQT1TXvs8q/g
     dNAJgrGzFSrb+ExKl1Cu9/EVTGMbvFYeOJSajRiw=
Public Key DNS Lookup


Building DNS Query for default._domainkey.cyberlite.co
Retrieved this publickey from DNS:
Validating Signature


result = invalid
Details: public key: not available

Code:
SpamAssassin Score: 0.11
Message is NOT marked as spam
Points breakdown:
 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID         DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
 
Last edited:
Hi KingsMike,

according to your DKIM - issue: Sorry, but we can't help you here. Due to the fact that you anonymize your domain/IP, we have no possibility to investigate the issue. Your informations just lead to the facts, that all should be working as expected.
 
Hi KingsMike,

according to your DKIM - issue: Sorry, but we can't help you here. Due to the fact that you anonymize your domain/IP, we have no possibility to investigate the issue. Your informations just lead to the facts, that all should be working as expected.

Hi,

I've edited the original post.
 
Hi KingsMike,

pls. keep in mind, that DNS - changes may take up 48 hours, untill all worldwide DNS - servers are synched. Yes, it is mostly faster, but you should at least wait 6-12 hours after your changes! ;)

Investigations ( Source: http://dkimcore.org/c/keycheck ):
Code:
DKIM Record for default._domainkey.cyberlite.co


This is not a good DKIM key record. You should fix the errors shown in red.

DNS query failed for 'default._domainkey.cyberlite.co':NXDOMAIN

A public-key (p=) is required
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top