Maybe I am wrong and that's why I am asking here to make this more clear.
We are using WHMCS to sell shared hosting with Plesk Onyx and in near future, we are going to expand and have more new servers. My question here is why should we use a multi-server?
Let's start with pricing, if we have two servers we have to pay for 2 licenses + one multi server extension if I understood right.
This will give us more automation, but does it really cost additional 11,16€/mo?
Now let's talk about features, if I understood correctly we can just add a new server to WHMCS and switch it manually in plans then one of the servers is full or empty. We can control this manually and save up to 111,60 € if we are using two servers.
Probably I did miss something important, but anyway I was thinking about this for a long time.
We are using WHMCS to sell shared hosting with Plesk Onyx and in near future, we are going to expand and have more new servers. My question here is why should we use a multi-server?
Let's start with pricing, if we have two servers we have to pay for 2 licenses + one multi server extension if I understood right.
This will give us more automation, but does it really cost additional 11,16€/mo?
Now let's talk about features, if I understood correctly we can just add a new server to WHMCS and switch it manually in plans then one of the servers is full or empty. We can control this manually and save up to 111,60 € if we are using two servers.
Probably I did miss something important, but anyway I was thinking about this for a long time.